人体右室起搏头胸导联和常规导联心电图的比较
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:


Comparison of head-chest lead and routine lead electrocardiograms in human right ventricular pacing
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的:观察起搏前后心电图参比点电位的变化及其规律。方法:同步记录永久性起搏器植入术患者右室起搏与非起搏时头胸导联和常规导联2种心电图,比较Q波、R波和S波振幅。结果:非起搏时,常规导联Q波、S波振幅大于头胸导联,常规导联R波振幅小于头胸导联;起搏时,常规导联心电图Q波、R波、S波振幅均小于头胸导联(P均<0.01)。结论:心电活动的传导方向对参比点的电位变化有较大影响。

    Abstract:

    Objective:To study the changes and rules of the reference point potentials of electrocardiograms (ECGs) before and after pacing. Methods: The head-chest lead and routine lead ECGs of the patients with permanent pacemaker implantation were recorded with and without right ventricular pacing; the Q, R and S wave amplitudes were compared between the 2 ECGs.Results: Without right ventricular pacing, the amplitudes of Q and S wave of routine lead were higher than those of the head-chest lead; the amplitude of R wave was lower than that of the head-chest lead. With right ventricle pacing, the amplitudes of Q, R, and S waves of routine lead were lower than those of head-chest lead(all P<0.01).Conclusion: The transduction direction of the cardiac excitement has great influence on the potentials of the reference point.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
相关视频

分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期:
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码
重要通知
友情提醒: 近日发现论文正式见刊或网络首发后,有人冒充我刊编辑部名义给作者发邮件,要求添加微信,此系诈骗行为!可致电编辑部核实:021-81870792。
            《海军军医大学学报》编辑部
关闭