焦虑敏感问卷中文版对焦虑障碍患者测试的信度和效度
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

上海医学重点专科建设计划项目(ZK2012A12), 上海市虹口区科委医学科研项目(虹科一医1007), 上海市虹口区卫生局科研基金(虹卫1002-09), 上海市虹口区卫生局公共卫生优秀青年人才培养计划(2010), 上海市虹口区医学重点专科建设项目(虹卫\[2010\]91号).


Reliability and validity of Chinese revision of anxiety sensitivity index-revised among patients with anxiety disorders
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

Supported by Shanghai Key Medical Specialty Program (ZK2012A12), Medical Program of Shanghai Hongkou District Science and Technology Commission (1007), Research Program of Shanghai Hongkou District Health Bureau (1002-09), Outstanding Youth Training Program on Public Health of Shanghai Hongkou District Health Bureau (2010), and Key Medical Specialty Program of Shanghai Hongkou District (\[2010\]91).

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的测试焦虑敏感问卷中文修订版(ASI-CR)应用于焦虑障碍患者中的信度与效度。方法以ASI-CR、特质焦虑问卷(T-AI)、汉密尔顿焦虑量表(HAMA)和焦虑敏感测定量表(ASI-R)调查焦虑障碍患者68例,检验ASI-CR的信度和效度。结果整个问卷及各因子的内部一致性系数为0.77~0.89,分半信度为0.67~0.88。因子间的相关系数为0.51~0.65,因子与ASI-CR总分之间的相关系数为0.83~0.89,各因子内部的相关系数为0.60~0.90。ASI-CR总分及3个因子分与ASI-R总分相关系数为0.76~0.97,ASI-CR 3个因子分与ASI-R中对应的因子分相关系数为0.78~0.97。焦虑障碍患者在ASI-CR总分及“对生理唤醒的恐惧”因子分、“对认知失控的恐惧”因子分均高于中学生常模,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。探索性因子分析示3个因子的累积贡献率为65.06%,条目的因子负荷率为0.51~0.88,但因子间条目分布不均,“对认知失控的恐惧”因子中2个条目负荷过低(0.22、0.48)。结论ASI-CR用于焦虑障碍患者有较好的信度、效标效度和内容效度,但结构效度尚待进一步修订完善。

    Abstract:

    ObjectiveTo evaluate the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the anxiety sensitivity index-revised(ASI-CR) among patients with anxiety disorders. MethodsA total of 68 patients with anxiety disorders were interviewed using anxiety sensitivity index-revised (ASI-R), trait anxiety inventory (T-AI), Hamilton anxiety scale (HAMA) and ASI-CR; the reliability and validity of ASI-CR were examined. ResultsInternal consistency of ASI-CR and each factor was 0.77-0.89 and the split-half reliability was 0.67-0.88. The internal correlation coefficient between factors was 0.51-0.65, the correlation coefficient between factors and the total score was 0.83-0.89, and internal correlation coefficient among factors was 0.60-0.90. The correlation coefficient between the total score and factor scores of ASI-CR and total score of ASI-R was 0.76-0.97, and the correlation coefficient between factor scores of ASI-CR and corresponding factor score of ASI-R was 0.78-0.97. The total score and two factor (physical concern and cognitive concern) score of ASI-CR in anxiety patients were significantly higher than the norm (P<0.01). Exploratory factor analysis revealed that the three lower-order ASI-CR factors contributed 65.06% of the total variance. Factor loading of items was 0.51-0.88, but the items were unevenly distributed among factors. Two items had low loading to cognitive concern factor (0.22, 0.48). ConclusionThe ASI-CR displays satisfactory reliability, criterion validity and content validity among anxiety patients, but further research is needed to improve its structural validity.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
相关视频

分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2012-08-30
  • 最后修改日期:2012-11-22
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期:
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码
重要通知
友情提醒: 近日发现论文正式见刊或网络首发后,有人冒充我刊编辑部名义给作者发邮件,要求添加微信,此系诈骗行为!可致电编辑部核实:021-81870792。
            《海军军医大学学报》编辑部
关闭