超声引导下腹横肌平面阻滞复合瑞芬太尼靶控输注在胰管结石体外震波碎石术中的应用
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

R576

基金项目:

上海市优秀青年医学人才培养计划(2017YQ015),上海市青年科技启明星计划(19QA1408500).


Application of ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block combined with target-controlled infusion of remifentanil in extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy of pancreatic stones
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

Supported by Young Medical Talent Training Program of Shanghai (2017YQ015) and Shanghai Rising Star Program for Young Scientists (19QA1408500).

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的 评价超声引导下腹横肌平面阻滞复合瑞芬太尼靶控输注应用于胰管结石体外震波碎石术(ESWL)中的效果。方法 选择60例首次接受ESWL治疗的胰管结石患者,随机分为R组和TR组,每组30例。R组患者仅接受瑞芬太尼靶控输注,TR组患者接受瑞芬太尼靶控输注前30 min行超声引导下腹横肌平面阻滞。采用Dixon序贯法计算两组患者的瑞芬太尼半数效应浓度(EC50),记录患者围手术期疼痛视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分、Ramsay镇静评分、血流动力学参数、呼吸参数和不良反应。结果 R组和TR组患者瑞芬太尼EC50分别为3.448ng/mL(95%CI 1.636~3.946 ng/mL)和2.523 ng/mL(95%CI 0.744~2.991 ng/mL),差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组患者的VAS评分和Ramsay镇静评分相当(P均>0.05),血流动力学参数和呼吸参数差异均无统计学意义(P均>0.05)。TR组患者瘙痒发生率[6.7%(2/30)vs 26.7%(8/30),P=0.038]和总不良反应发生率[10.0%(3/30)vs 56.7%(17/30),P<0.001]低于R组。结论 腹横肌平面阻滞复合瑞芬太尼靶控输注可为胰管结石ESWL提供满意的镇痛和镇静效果,减少术中瑞芬太尼用量,降低不良反应的发生率。

    Abstract:

    Objective To evaluate the effect of ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block (TAPB) combined with target-controlled infusion (TCI) of remifentanil in extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) of pancreatic stones. Methods Sixty patients with pancreatic stones who received ESWL for the first time were randomly divided into R group and TR group (30 cases in each group). Patients in R group received TCI of remifentanil only, while patients in TR group received ultrasound-guided TAPB 30 min before TCI of remifentanil. Dixon's up-and-down method was used to calculate the half maximum effective concentration (EC50) of remifentanil. Perioperativevisual analog scale (VAS), Ramsay sedation scale, hemodynamic parameters, respiratory parameters, and adverse events were also recorded. Results The EC50 of remifentanil were 3.448 ng/mL (95% confidence interval[CI] 1.636-3.946 ng/mL) and 2.523 ng/mL (95% CI 0.744-2.991 ng/mL) in the R group and the TR group, respectively (P<0.05). The VAS score and the Ramsay sedation scale were comparable between the two groups (both P>0.05), and there were no significant differences in hemodynamics and respiratory parameters between the two groups (both P>0.05). Compared with the R group, the total incidence rate of adverse events was lower in the TR group (10.0%[3/30]vs 56.7%[17/30], P<0.001), and so was the incidence rate of itching (6.7%[2/30]vs 26.7%[8/30], P=0.038). Conclusion TAPB combined with TCI of remifentanil can provide satisfactory analgesia and sedation for ESWL of pancreatic stones, and can reduce the dosage of remifentanil, with less adverse events.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
相关视频

分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2020-05-29
  • 最后修改日期:2020-07-21
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2021-01-27
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码
重要通知
友情提醒: 近日发现论文正式见刊或网络首发后,有人冒充我刊编辑部名义给作者发邮件,要求添加微信,此系诈骗行为!可致电编辑部核实:021-81870792。
            《海军军医大学学报》编辑部
关闭