基于Go/No-Go范式的多任务操作实验评估军校学员的反应抑制能力
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

全军装备军内科研项目(20AZ1001),海军军医大学(第二军医大学)海军特色医学中心强基计划(21M1001),海军军医大学(第二军医大学)校级课题(2023QN042).


Evaluation of reaction inhibition among military university students by multitasking operation based on Go/No-Go paradigm
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

Supported by Military Scientific Research Project of PLA Equipment (20AZ1001),Strengthening Basic Disciplines Program of Naval Medical Center of Naval Medical University (Second Military Medical University)(21M1001),and Project of Naval Medical University (Second Military Medical University)(2023QN042).

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的 探索军校学员在多任务操作情境中的反应抑制能力特点。方法 选择127名军校学员作为被试,采用Go/No-Go范式进行测试,通过重复测量方差分析和分布检验等方法探索模拟驾驶任务的干扰对被试Go/No-Go测试表现的影响。结果 对127名被试的测试结果显示,在击中率和虚报率上存在干扰任务和Go试次比例的交互作用,即在没有干扰任务时60%试次比例与40%试次比例条件下被试的击中率和虚报率差异无统计学意义(均P>0.05),而在有干扰任务时60%试次比例条件下被试的击中率和虚报率大于40%试次比例条件(均P<0.01)。在击中率、虚报率和辨别力指标d’上干扰任务的主效应显著(均P<0.01),即干扰任务降低了被试的击中率和辨别力、增大了虚报率。不同被试在有无干扰任务时辨别力的变化不同,根据无干扰任务与有干扰任务时辨别力指标d’的差值的平均数加减1个标准差,可将被试分为易受干扰组23人(18.11%)、不易受干扰组20人(15.75%)和中间组84人(66.14%)。结论 干扰任务增加了军校学员在多任务操作时的心理负荷,降低了其反应抑制能力,且军校学员的反应抑制能力存在个体差异。

    Abstract:

    Objective To explore the characteristics of response inhibition of military university students during multitasking operation. Methods Repeated measures of ANOVA as well as distribution test were employed to explore how the performance of 127 military university students in Go/No-Go test was affected by simulated driving task. Results The test results of 127 participants showed that there was a interaction between the interference task and the Go trial proportion on the hit rate and false alarm rate, that is, no significant difference was observed between the 60% and 40% of trial proportion without interference task (both P>0.05), but the hit rate and false alarm rate in the 60% trial proportion condition were significantly higher than those in the 40% trial proportion condition under interference task (both P<0.01). In addition, significant main effects of interference task were observed on hit rate, false alarm rate, and discrimination index d’ (all P<0.01), that is, the interference task reduced the hit rate and discrimination, but increased the false alarm rate. Moreover, individual differences existed in the discrimination index d’ changes, and the participants were divided into easily disturbed group (n=23, 18.11%), undisturbed group (n=20, 15.75%), and intermediate group (n=84, 66.14%) by adding or subtracting 1 standard deviation from the mean of the difference. Conclusion The interference tasks increase the psychological load of military university students during multitasking operation, and impair the response inhibition; and individual differences exist in response inhibition.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
相关视频

分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2022-05-18
  • 最后修改日期:2023-10-10
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2024-09-23
  • 出版日期: 2024-09-20
文章二维码
重要通知
友情提醒: 近日发现论文正式见刊或网络首发后,有人冒充我刊编辑部名义给作者发邮件,要求添加微信,此系诈骗行为!可致电编辑部核实:021-81870792。
            《海军军医大学学报》编辑部
关闭