政策工具与创新对乡村医疗卫生服务体系信息化的影响
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

杭州市爱国卫生运动委员会办公室委托课题.


Effect of policy instruments and innovation on informatization of rural health service system
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

Supported by Project Commissioned by Hangzhou Patriotic Health Campaign Committee Office.

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的 探索政策工具与创新对乡村医疗卫生服务体系信息化的影响。方法 采用网络爬虫工具收集2009-2023年公开发布的与乡村医疗卫生服务体系信息化相关的中央政策文件,采用词频分析与词频-逆文件频率(TF-IDF)权重计算方法提取核心关键词,从政策工具和政策创新过程2个维度进行政策文本内容分析,采用指数增长模型拟合政策工具演化趋势。结果 在纳入的45项中央政策文本中,总计使用政策工具178次,需求面政策工具占比最高(71次,39.89%),反映出政策对乡村医疗卫生服务多样化需求的响应;供给面政策工具共被使用51次,其中“信息系统及基础设施建设”政策工具使用频次最高(33次),反映出国家加大数字基础设施与技术投入的导向。从政策创新过程看,政策工具主要作用于政策创新的采纳阶段(55.06%),其次是执行阶段(38.20%),最少用于发起阶段(6.74%);发起阶段受3类政策工具的影响较为均衡,采纳阶段受需求面政策工具影响最多,执行阶段受供给面政策工具影响最多。这种变化趋势反映出近年来政策重心由价值引导逐步转向操作性和落地性,体现出政策对数字技术推进、治理能力提升等现实需求的适应。结论 不同类型政策工具在信息化创新各阶段具有差异化效用,这表明需要将政策工具与政策创新各阶段精准匹配,有针对性推进信息化进程;同时细化和完善现行顶层政策文件,明确界定相关政策理念;此外,针对偏远和贫困地区信息化基础建设滞后,细化政策理念执行路径。

    Abstract:

    Objective To explore the impact of policy instruments and innovation on the informatization of rural health service system. Methods Central government policy documents related to the informatization of rural health service system, publicly released between 2009 and 2023, were collected using web crawler tools. Keyword extraction was conducted through word frequency analysis and term frequency-inverse document frequency (TF-IDF) calculation. Content analysis of policy texts was carried out from the dual perspectives of policy instruments and the policy innovation process. An exponential growth model was used to fit the evolutionary trend. Results Among the 45 central policies included, policy instruments were used 178 times in total. The demand-side policy instruments accounted for the highest proportion (71 times, 39.89%), reflecting policy responsiveness to the diversified needs of rural healthcare services. The supply side policy instruments have been used a total of 51 times, with the “information system and infrastructure construction” policy instrument being the most frequently (33 times), indicating a national focus on enhancing investment in digital infrastructure and technology. In terms of the policy innovation process, policy instruments were primarily utilized during the adoption stage of policy ideas (55.06%), followed by the implementation stage (38.20%), with the initiation stage being the least influenced (6.74%). The initiation stage was relatively evenly influenced by all 3 types of policy instruments; the adoption stage was mainly influenced by demand-side instruments, while the implementation stage was dominated by supply-side instruments. This trend reflected a policy shift in recent years from value guidance toward practical operability and implementation, demonstrating alignment with the real-world needs of advancing digital technology and improving governance capacity. Conclusion Different policy instruments exhibit stage-specific effectiveness in driving informatization innovation, indicating the need to precisely align instruments with each phase of the policy innovation process to advance informatization in a targeted manner. Top-level policy documents should be refined to clearly define relevant policy concepts. Additionally, execution pathways must be detailed to accelerate infrastructure development in remote and economically disadvantaged regions.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
相关视频

分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2024-11-21
  • 最后修改日期:2025-06-04
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2025-06-21
  • 出版日期: 2025-06-20
文章二维码
重要通知
友情提醒: 近日发现论文正式见刊或网络首发后,有人冒充我刊编辑部名义给作者发邮件,要求添加微信,此系诈骗行为!可致电编辑部核实:021-81870792。
            《海军军医大学学报》编辑部
关闭