军人跨界症状量表的编制和信效度检验
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

“十四五”网信规划重点项目(145AWX200020011X),国家社会科学基金重点项目(2022-SKJJ-B-041),国家重点研发计划课题(2022YFC3103204),部队心理卫生防护项目([2024]432-73).


Military cross-cutting symptom scale and its reliability and validity
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

Supported by “The 14th Five-year Plan” Key Program of Internet and Information Technology (145AWX200020011X), Key Program of National Social Science Foundation (2022-SKJJ-B-041), National Key R&D Program Topics (2022YFC3103204), and Mental Health Protection Project ([2024] 432-73).

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的 编制军人跨界症状量表(MCCSS),并检验其信效度。方法 通过文献分析、问卷调查、小组讨论、专家咨询和预实验等方法,确定量表的维度和条目。采用整群抽样法分别收集相关人员数据,检验量表的心理测量学指标。结果 MCCSS包含抑郁、焦虑、躯体症状、厌世倾向、睡眠问题、强迫、精神病性症状、应激创伤和掩饰性9个因子共38个条目;项目分析显示,量表37个条目(除去1个迫选题)得分与量表总分的相关系数为0.538~0.875(均P<0.01),决断值为5.190~28.149,项目区分度良好;量表及各维度的Cronbach’s α系数为0.825~0.972,Spearman-Brown分半信度系数为0.747~0.955;验证性因素分析结果显示χ2/df=3.419,标准均方根残差为0.033,近似均方根误差为0.073,规范拟合指数为0.868,增值拟合指数为0.903,塔克刘易斯指数为0.887,比较拟合指数为0.902,量表的一阶9因子模型拟合较好;各项目在所属因子上的载荷为0.597~0.954(均P<0.01);量表与效标关联效度测评工具的相关系数为0.392~0.773(均P<0.01),量表及各维度与聚合效度测评工具的相关系数为0.257~0.519(均P<0.01)。结论 MCCSS具有较好的信度和效度,可作为军人心理健康检测和筛查的工具。

    Abstract:

    Objective To develop a military cross-cultural symptom scale (MCCSS) and evaluate its reliability and validity. Methods The dimensions and items of the scale were determined through literature analysis, questionnaire surveys, group discussions, expert consultations, and pre-experiments. Cluster sampling was employed to collect data from the participants to examine the psychometric properties of the scale. Results The MCCSS comprised 38 items across 9 factors: depression, anxiety, somatic symptoms, misanthropic tendency, sleep problems, compulsions, psychotic symptoms, stress trauma, and defensiveness. Item analysis revealed that the 37 items (except 1 forced-choice item) exhibited correlations from 0.538 to 0.875 with the total scale score (all P<0.01), with critical ratios ranging from 5.190 to 28.149, indicating good discriminative power. The Cronbach’s α coefficients for the total scale and subscales ranged from 0.825 to 0.972, and the Spearman-Brown split-half reliability coefficients ranged from 0.747 to 0.955. The results of confirmatory factor analysis showed that χ2/df=3.419, standardized root mean square residual=0.033, root mean square error of approximation=0.073, normed fit index=0.868, incremental fit index= 0.903, Tucker-Lewis index=0.887, comparative fit index=0.902, and the scale’s first-order 9-factor model fit well. The loads of each item on the factor to which it belonged ranged from 0.597 to 0.954 (all P<0.01). The correlation coefficients between the scale and the scale for criterion-related validity ranged from 0.392 to 0.773 (all P<0.01), and the correlation coefficients between the scale and the scale for convergent validity ranged from 0.257 to 0.519 (all P<0.01). Conclusion The MCCSS in this study has good reliability and validity and can be used as a mental health testing and screening tool for military personnel.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
相关视频

分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2023-11-30
  • 最后修改日期:2024-05-10
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2025-06-21
  • 出版日期: 2025-06-20
文章二维码
重要通知
友情提醒: 近日发现论文正式见刊或网络首发后,有人冒充我刊编辑部名义给作者发邮件,要求添加微信,此系诈骗行为!可致电编辑部核实:021-81870792。
            《海军军医大学学报》编辑部
关闭