可吸收和金属张力带治疗髌骨骨折的对比研究
DOI:
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:


Control study of biodegradable tension band and metallic tension band for the treatment of patella fractures
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的:比较生物可吸收张力带(Biofix棒和Biopoly人工韧带)与金属张力带(克氏针和钢丝)治疗髌骨骨折的疗效。方法:38例髌骨骨折患者被随机分为可吸收张力带治疗组(18例)和金属张力带治疗组(20例),随访时间14-32个月,平均24个月,根据术后X线片和关节功能恢复情况评定疗效。结果:平均骨折愈合时间为8周。可吸收张力带治疗组:优13例,良4例,差1例;金属张力带治疗组:优15例,良3例,差2例。两种治疗方法临床效果无统计学差别。结论:生物可吸收张力带是治疗髌骨骨折的有效方法,并具有无需二期手术取出内固定的优点。

    Abstract:

    Objective: To compare the outcome of patella fractures fixed by biodegradable tension band fixation(BTB) with Biofix rods and Biopoly ligaments and metallic tension band (MTB)with Kirschner wire and metallic cerclage wire in a randomized study. Methods:Thirty-eight patients(18 with BTB and 20 with MTB) were treated in this group. The follow-up time was 24 (14-32) months. The results were evaluated by radiography and recovery of joint function. Results: The fractures healed in all patients after a mean time of 8 weeks. In BTB group, the clinical outcome was good in 13 patients, fair in 4, and poor in 1. In MTB group, the corresponding figures were 15, 3 and 2. There was no clinical differences between the two methods. Conclusion: Patella fractures can be treated successfully by using biodegradable tension band fixation with no need for a second operation to remove the implants.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
相关视频

分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期:
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码
重要通知
友情提醒: 近日发现论文正式见刊或网络首发后,有人冒充我刊编辑部名义给作者发邮件,要求添加微信,此系诈骗行为!可致电编辑部核实:021-81870792。
            《海军军医大学学报》编辑部
关闭