【打印本页】 【下载PDF全文】 【HTML】 查看/发表评论下载PDF阅读器关闭

←前一篇|后一篇→

过刊浏览    高级检索

本文已被:浏览 2757次   下载 2188 本文二维码信息
码上扫一扫!
HPHJ-A视频喉镜与Macintosh喉镜的临床应用效果对比研究
刘虎△,石学银△*,陈巍,普隽,袁红斌,刘刚
0
(第二军医大学长征医院麻醉科,上海 200003\)
摘要:
目的对比观察HPHJ-A视频喉镜与Macintosh喉镜的临床插管应用效果,分析各自的优缺点。方法选择100例拟行气管插管全麻的患者,随机均分为2组,分别应用HPHJ-A视频喉镜和Macintosh喉镜进行声门暴露,插管。观察并记录使用两种喉镜暴露患者声门的Cormack-Lehane分级,插管前后患者血流动力学变化,插管时间及插管尝试次数。结果HPHJ-A视频喉镜暴露声门的Cormack-Lehane分级结果明显优于Macintosh喉镜,两组患者的血流动力学变化、插管时间及插管尝试次数没有显著差异。以患者是否存在困难插管进行亚组处理,Cormack-Lehane分级Ⅲ~Ⅳ级患者使用 HPHJ-A视频喉镜的血流动力学影响更小(P<0.05),插管时间和插管尝试次数更少(P<0.05)。结论HPHJ-A视频喉镜与Macintosh喉镜相比可以明显改善声门的暴露状况,尤其对困难气道患者的麻醉管理具有一定的优势。
关键词:  气管内插管法  HPHJ-A视频喉镜  Macintosh喉镜
DOI:10.3724/SP.J.1008.2010.01073
投稿时间:2010-03-17修订日期:2010-08-16
基金项目:军队“十一五”重点专项课题(08Z021).
Comparison between HPHJ-A video laryngoscope and macintosh laryngoscope in clinical intubation
LIU Hu△, SHI Xue-yin△*,CHEN Wei, PU Jun, YUAN Hong-bin, LIU Gang
(Department of Anesthesiology, Changzheng Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai 200003, China)
Abstract:
ObjectiveTo compare the clinical outcomes of intubation between HPHJ-A video laryngoscope and Macintosh laryngoscope, and to analyze the advantages and disadvantages of each approach.MethodsTotally 100 patients who were to undergo general anesthesia with endotracheal intubation were randomly allocated for airway management with one of the two devices: HPHJ-A video laryngoscope and Macintosh laryngoscope. The following data were observed and recorded for the two groups: the Cormack-Lehane grade of exposing the glottis, hemodynamic alteration before and after endotracheal intubation, intubation time, and intubation attempts.ResultsHPHJ-A video laryngoscope resulted in a better glottis exposure than the Macintosh laryngoscope, and the results of hemodynamic alteration, intubation time, and intubation attempts were similar between the two groups. For patients with a difficult airway (Cormack-Lehane Ⅲ-Ⅳ) , HPHJ-A video laryngoscope resulted in a slighter hemodynamic alteration(P<0.05), a higher successful intubation rate, and a shorter intubation time(P<0.05) compared with Macintosh laryngoscope. ConclusionThe HPHJ-A video laryngoscope can greatly improve the glottic exposure compared with the Macintosh laryngoscope, especially for patients with difficult airway.
Key words:  introtracheal intubation  HPHJ-A video laryngoscope  Macintosh laryngoscope