| 本文已被：浏览 2371次 下载 1855次 |
码上扫一扫！ |
| Lenke 2型特发性脊柱侧凸三维矫形手术的有限元模拟 |
| 刘祥胜1,2△,吴冰1,3△,魏显招1,吴大江1,杨宗德1,易红蕾1,王传锋1,董有海2,李明1* |
|
|
(1. 第二军医大学长海医院骨科,上海 200433;
2. 复旦大学附属上海市第五人民医院骨科,上海 200240;
3. 解放军401医院骨科,青岛 266071
*通信作者) |
|
| 摘要: |
| 目的 利用建立的Lenke 2型青少年特发性脊柱侧凸(adolescent idiopathic scoliosis,AIS)三维有限元模型,分别仿真模拟前路、后路手术矫形操作,探讨其最佳手术方案。方法 建立Lenke 2型AIS的有限元模型,分别模拟前路和后路共5种不同的矫形方案,比较不同手术方案的矫形效果和双肩平衡参数的变化。结果 5种不同矫形方案有限元模拟术后的上胸弯冠状面Cobb角和矫形率分别为:21.5(44.8%)、26.5(32.1%)、28.1(27.9%)、34.1(12.5%)、32(17.9%),各矫形方案的主胸弯矫正率无明显差别。胸椎矢状面生理后凸得以维持。5种矫形方案术后各双肩平衡影像学参数较术前有所升高,除方案A(上端固定椎为T2)外,其余各方案的喙突高度差均＞9 mm,锁骨角均＞2.5°,锁骨倾斜角差均＞4.5°。结论 对于左肩高的含结构性上胸弯Lenke 2型AIS,上端固定椎选择T2且完全融合上胸弯,可取得上胸弯、主胸弯良好的三维矫形和双肩平衡。部分融合上胸弯(上端固定椎为T3、T4),上胸弯的矫正率稍差,术后容易出现轻度到中度双肩失平衡。前路或后路选择性胸主弯融合,难以恢复上胸弯的正常脊柱序列,术后会导致轻度到中度双肩失平衡。 |
| 关键词: 脊柱侧凸 全椎弓根螺钉技术 生物力学 有限元分析 后路矫形 前路矫形 选择性主胸弯融合 |
| DOI：10.3724/SP.J.1008.2012.00732 |
| 投稿时间：2012-04-08修订日期：2012-06-06 |
| 基金项目:国家自然科学基金(30571888). |
|
| Three-dimensional finite element simulation of surgical correction for Lenke 2 type adolescent idiopathic scoliosis |
| LIU Xiang-sheng1,2△,WU Bing1,3△,WEI Xian-zhao1, WU Da-jiang1, YANG Zong-de1, YI Hong-lei1, WANG Chuan-feng1, DONG You-hai2, LI Ming1* |
(1. Department of Orthopedics, Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai 200433, China;
2. Department of Orthopedics, The Fifth People’s Hospital of Shanghai, Fudan University, Shanghai 200240, China;
3. Department of Orthopedics, No. 401 Hospital, PLA Ji’nan Military Area Command, Qingdao 266071, Shandong, China
*Corresponding author.) |
| Abstract: |
| ObjectiveTo simulate different anterior and posterior correction strategies using finite element model of Lenke 2 type adolescent idiopathic scoliosis(AIS), in an effort to seek the optimal surgical protocol. MethodsThe finite element model of Lenke 2 type AIS was established and used to simulate five surgical strategies. The effectiveness and shoulder balance parameters were compared among different surgical approaches. ResultsThe coronary proximal thoracic(PT) Cobb angle and corrective rates of the five surgical strategies were 21.5(44.8%), 26.5(32.1%), 28.1(27.9%), 34.1(12.5%), and 32(17.9%). The corrective rates for the main thoracic curves were not significantly different among the five strategies, and the physiological sagittal configuration was maintained. Postoperative radiographic shoulder balance parameters were increased for all five surgical protocols. Except for strategy A(posterior fusion from T2 to T11), other four strategy achieved the following outcomes: coracoid height difference＞9 mm, clavical angle＞2.5° and clavicular tilt angle difference＞4.5° .ConclusionSimulation of posterior correction and fusion to T2 including both thoracic curve can achieve excellent three-dimensional corrective results and balanced shoulders for Lenke 2 type AIS model with preoperative left elevated shoulder. Partial fusion of PT curves to T3 or T4 results in inferior corrective rate of PT curve and mild or moderate shoulder imbalance. Simulation of anterior or posterior selective main thoracic curve fusion has very low spontaneous PT corrective rate and can lead to deteriorated shoulder imbalance slight to moderate degrees. |
| Key words: scoliosis all-pedicle screw construction biomechanics finite element analysis posterior correction anterior correction selective main thoracic curve fusion |
