【打印本页】 【下载PDF全文】 【HTML】 查看/发表评论下载PDF阅读器关闭

←前一篇|后一篇→

过刊浏览    高级检索

本文已被:浏览 1705次   下载 1654 本文二维码信息
码上扫一扫!
军人精神疾病预测量表信度、效度的验证性研究
于海波1,拓楠1,周桦2,蔡文鹏1,严进1*
0
(1. 第二军医大学心理与精神卫生学系, 上海 200433;
2. 解放军73021部队医院药房, 杭州 310023
*通信作者)
摘要:
目的 检验军人精神疾病预测量表的信度及效度。 方法 采取随机整群抽样法抽取1 477名官兵,以军人精神疾病预测量表进行测评,并对其中120名官兵同时测量中国军人心理健康量表(CMMHS)。利用统计软件对结果进行分析,考察量表的信度及效度。 结果 总量表的Cronbach's α系数为0.784,分量表为0.705~0.854(P <0.01);总量表的分半信度为0.914,分量表为0.754~0.934(P <0.01)。各因子间相关系数为0.512~0.948,各因子与总量表的相关系数为0.673~0.961(P <0.01)。维量分析表明各维度间有较好的区分度。探索性因素分析结果显示,此研究结果与原量表各条目的因子归类一致。验证性因素分析发现模型拟合程度较高。该量表校标效度较高。 结论 军人精神疾病预测量表信度、效度较好,符合心理测量学标准,可作为军人精神疾病预测的有效工具。
关键词:  军事人员  精神病  信度  效度
DOI:10.3724/SP.J.1008.2015.00872
投稿时间:2015-01-13修订日期:2015-05-09
基金项目:国家科技支撑计划(2009BAI77B04),全军后勤科研基金"十二五"重大项目(AWS13J003),上海市教委科研创新重点项目(11ZS79).
Confirmatory research on reliability and validity of mental disorder predictive scale for servicemen
YU Hai-bo1,TUO Nan1,ZHOU Hua2,CAI Wen-peng1,YAN Jin1*
(1. Department of Psychology and Mental Health, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai 200433, China;
2. Department of Pharmacy, Hospital of PLA No. 73021 Troop, Hangzhou 310023, Zhejiang, China
*Corresponding author)
Abstract:
Objective To examine the reliability and validity of the mental disorder predictive scale for servicemen. Methods A test with the mental disorder predictive scale for servicemen was carried out in 1 477 soldiers and officers selected by random cluster sampling, and 120 of them were also tested by Chinese Military Mental Health Scale (CMMHS) at the same time. Statistical software was used to analyze the results and to assess the reliability and validity of the mental disorder predictive scale . Results The Cronbach's α coefficient of the total scale was 0.784, and those of the subscales were 0.705-0.854 (P <0.01). The half reliability of total scale was 0.914, and those of the subscales were 0.754-0.934(P <0.01). The correlation coefficients among factors were 0.512-0.948 (P <0.01), and the correlation coefficients of single factors with total scale score were 0.673-0.961 (P <0.01). Dimensional analysis proved that there were good distinctions between subscales. The exploratory factor analysis showed that the results of this study agreed with the collation of each entry factor of the original scale. There was a higher degree of fitting according to the results of confirmatory factor analysis. The validity of the present scale was effective. Conclusion The reliability and validity of the mental disorder predictive scale for servicemen are satisfactory and meet the standard psychometrics; it can be utilized as an effective tool for prediction of mental disorders among servicemen.
Key words:  military personnel  psychotic disorders  reliability  validity