| 摘要: |
| 目的 纳入海军驱逐舰部队官兵群体，验证历史文献中的安全文化维度，为后续研究验证相关量表可行性和建立安全文化模型提供支撑。方法 参考历史文献选取6个维度共38个条目，预调查和预分析后筛选出5个维度的28个条目编为正式量表；于海军某舰队整群抽取驱逐舰官兵群体为调查对象，发放问卷421份，回收有效问卷396份（94.06%），对数据进行统计分析。结果 有效问卷应答者中有17.42%（69/396）经历过安全事故，其中30.43%（21/69）曾为此受伤；探索性因子分析结果验证了所选取的安全文化构念中的5个维度：安全工作满意度、管理层的重视程度、大环境给予的支持、安全工作优先度、完成工作的压力，累积解释方差为67.62%，且各维度一致性检验效果好，Cronbach's α值皆高于0.8，表明量表具有较高的信度。维度得分显示，管理层的重视程度不足，且安全工作优先度较低。结论 驱逐舰部队的安全文化水平提升的空间很大；管理层的重视不足在一定程度上阻碍了安全教育，且安全工作没有得到应有的重视；量表的适用性良好，但沟通维度缺失，提示对东方民族及其子群体需设计更具针对性的维度。 |
| 关键词: 安全文化 安全气候 驱逐舰部队 探索性因子分析 内部一致性 |
| DOI：10.16781/j.0258-879x.2016.10.1287 |
| 投稿时间：2016-06-21修订日期：2016-09-03 |
| 基金项目:全军后勤科研计划重点项目（BHJ14L010），2016第二军医大学卫生勤务学系军事医学专项（2016WK04）. |
|
| Investigation of safety culture in a naval destroyer force of Chinese PLA |
| QI Liang1,XIE Ru-qing2,LIU Wen-bao3,CHEN Guo-liang3,LIU Xiao-rong1* |
(1. Department of Health Service, Faculty of Health Services, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai 200433, China;
2. Department of Health, Logistic Division of North Sea Fleet of PLA, Qingdao 266071, Shandong, China;
3. Department of Naval Health Service and Medical Equipment, Faculty of Naval Medicine, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai 200433, China
*Corresponding author) |
| Abstract: |
| Objective To validate the dimensions and items of safety culture of PLA navy by surveying the sailors and officers of a naval destroyer force using questionnaire, so as to provide evidence for designing and validating a safety culture scale for Chinese naval destroyer forces. Methods An initial safety culture scale was designed using 38 items of 6 dimensions based on previous literature. And a refined scale, which included 28 items of 5 dimnesions, was set up through pre-investigation and pre-analysis. The refined scale was then used to survey all the 421 military members of a naval destroyer force of Chinese PLA. A total of 396 (94.06%) validated questionnaires were recollected for analysis. Results It was found that 69 (17.42%) responders had experienced safety accidents, and 30.43% (21/69) of them were injured in the accidents. Exploratory factor analysis was performed to validate the five dimensions in the scale:satisfaction with safety, management commitment, supportive environment, priority of safety and work pressure, with the total variance explained being 67.62% and the Cronbach's α calculated for each dimension being all over 0.8, indicating a good internal consistency. The dimension scores showed that management commitment to safety was insufficient and the priority of safety was low. Conclusion The safety culture has great room for improvement in the naval destroyer force. Insufficient management commitment to safety impedes the education of safety, and the low priority of safety demands more emphasis on safety issues in the destroyer force. Although most dimensions of the scale have been confirmed, lack of communication dimension indicates pertinent dimensions should be designed with specific items for eastern nations. |
| Key words: safety culture safety climate naval destroyer forces exploratory factor analysis internal consistency |
