【打印本页】 【下载PDF全文】 【HTML】 查看/发表评论下载PDF阅读器关闭

←前一篇|后一篇→

过刊浏览    高级检索

本文已被:浏览 1571次   下载 1015 本文二维码信息
码上扫一扫!
2007-2017年烧伤后瘢痕研究的文献计量学分析
周浩,卫牧娟,陈郑礼,王光毅,夏照帆*
0
(海军军医大学(第二军医大学)长海医院烧创伤中心, 上海 200433
*通信作者)
摘要:
目的 了解烧伤后瘢痕的研究状况和发展趋势,为后续相关研究提供参考依据。方法 在Web of Science核心合集数据库检索烧伤后瘢痕的相关文献,应用文献计量学方法对文献的出版年份、国家或地区、机构、作者、文献研究方向、文献被引频次、文献来源出版物及其影响因子等方面进行分析。结果 2007-2017年Web of Science核心合集数据库共收录烧伤后瘢痕相关文献2 247篇,每年的文献量缓慢增长,发文量居第1位的国家或地区是美国(739篇,32.9%)、其次是中国大陆(195篇,8.7%),发文量最多的机构是澳大利亚昆士兰大学(57篇),发文量居第1位的作者是荷兰阿姆斯特丹自由大学的Middelkoop E(50篇)。烧伤后瘢痕研究方向主要为外科学和皮肤病学,文献主要来源于BurnsJ Burn Care Res;发文量前10位的期刊2017年平均影响因子为2.068 9,其发文量占文献总量的39.2%(881/2 247)。结论 2007-2017年烧伤后瘢痕相关文献逐年缓慢增加,多发表在影响因子较低的期刊上。美国、荷兰、澳大利亚关于烧伤后瘢痕开展的研究较多,在推动学术交流和科学发展方面起到了重要作用。中国大陆的发文量显著增加,但在文献质量方面与西方发达国家还存在一定差距。
关键词:  瘢痕  烧伤  文献计量学  Web of Science
DOI:10.16781/j.0258-879x.2019.01.0094
投稿时间:2018-09-11修订日期:2019-01-05
基金项目:国家自然科学基金国际(地区)合作与交流项目(81120108015),国家重点基础研究发展计划("973计划")项目(2012CB518100),国家自然科学基金(81772076),上海市卫生和计划生育委员会科研课题(20174Y0059).
Bibliometrics analysis on research status of scar caused by burns from 2007 to 2017
ZHOU Hao,WEI Mu-juan,CHEN Zheng-li,WANG Guang-yi,XIA Zhao-fan*
(Burn and Trauma Center, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University(Second Military Medical University), Shanghai 200433, China
*Corresponding author)
Abstract:
Objective To investigate the research situation and tendency on scar caused by burns, so as to provide references for the future research.Methods The papers concerning scar caused by burns were retrieved from Web of Science core collection database. The year, country or region, affiliation, author, research direction, citation, publication journals and the impact factor of publications were analyzed using bibliometrics.Results A total of 2 247 publications related with scar caused by burns were obtained in Web of Science core collection database from 2007 to 2017, and the number of literatures had grown slowly annually. The top 1 productive country or region was America (739, 32.9%), followed by Chinese Mainland (195, 8.7%); the top 1 productive affiliation was the University of Queensland in Australia (57), and the top 1 productive author was Middelkoop E from VU University Amsterdam (50). The scientific research direction mainly focused on surgery and dermology, and the literatures mainly came from Burns and J Burn Care Res. The numbers of papers released by top 10 journals accounted 39.2% of the total numbers of related publications, and the average impact factor of top 10 journals was 2.068 9 in 2017.Conclusion The number of literatures grow slowly annually from 2007 to 2017, and most of them are published in journals with low impact factor. America, the Netherlands and Australia have done more research on scar caused by burns, which plays a significant role in promoting scientific development and academic interaction. During the past 11 years, the number of papers from Chinese Mainland has increased sharply, but the quality is still behind those of western countries.
Key words:  scar  burns  bibliometrics  Web of Science