2种不同材质防护贴对防护用具导致的面部损伤/不适的防护效果观察
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

R197.38

基金项目:

上海市科学技术委员会临床研究重点项目(18411951400),上海市科学技术委员会长三角联合创新重点项目(19495810200),上海市公共卫生体系建设三年行动计划学科建设项目(GWV-10.1-XK24)


Observation on the protective effects of 2 different protective stickers on facial injury/discomfort caused by protective appliances
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

Supported by Key Clinical Research Program of Shanghai Science and Technology Commission (18411951400), Yangtze River Delta Joint Innovation Key Program of Shanghai Science and Technology Commission (19495810200), and Discipline Construction Program of Shanghai 3-Year Action Plan for Public Health System Construction (GWV-10.1-XK24)

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的 观察2种不同材质的防护贴对军队支援湖北医疗队员因佩戴防护用具导致的面部损伤/不适的防护作用,为寻找便捷有效的防护措施提供借鉴。方法 选择147名军队支援湖北医疗队队员,采用自行设计的医护人员佩戴防护用具后面部损伤/不适情况调查表对佩戴防护用具时使用海军军医大学(第二军医大学)药学系研发的防护凝胶贴片(海神贴)和3M亲水性敷料前后面部损伤/不适情况进行横断面现况调查,比较2种材质的防护贴对面部损伤/不适的防护效果。结果 共调查医护人员78名,其中使用海神贴的62人,使用3M亲水性敷料的16人。使用防护贴后,海神贴组和3M亲水敷料组医护人员面部损伤/不适各条目得分均明显降低,与使用前相比差异均有统计学意义(P均<0.05);但无论是使用前还是使用后,两组间医护人员面部损伤/不适各条目得分差异均无统计学意义(P均>0.05)。使用防护贴前,面部中重度损伤/不适比例占前4位的依次为眼镜/面罩起雾(85.9%,67/78)、皮肤压痕(80.8%,63/78)、接触处疼痛(74.4%,58/78)、闷热(71.8%,56/78),总体中重度损伤/不适的比例为80.8%(63/78);使用防护贴后,面部中重度损伤/不适比例占前4位的依次为眼镜/面罩起雾(53.8%,42/78)、闷热(41.0%,32/78)、呼吸阻力(41.0%,32/78)、皮肤压痕(38.5%,30/78),总体中重度损伤/不适的比例为43.6%(34/78);使用防护贴后面部损伤/不适改善率占前4位的依次为皮肤糜烂(76.5%)、皮肤红肿(67.3%)、接触处疼痛(63.8%)和接触处瘙痒(52.9%)。结论 2种不同材质的防护贴对防护用具导致的面部损伤/不适均有改善作用,值得推广使用。

    Abstract:

    Objective To observe the protective effects of 2 kinds of protective stickers made from different materials on facial injury/discomfort caused by wearing protective appliances of military medical members in the medical team supporting Hubei, so as to provide reference for developing convenient and effective protective measures.Methods Totally 147 military medical members in the medical team supporting Hubei were surveyed by the self-designed questionnaire of facial injury/discomfort caused by wearing protective appliances. Cross-sectional survey of the facial injury/discomfort before and after using the protective gel stickers (Haishen stickers, developed by the Faculty of Pharmacy, Naval Medical University[Second Military Medical University]) or 3M hydrophilic dressing was conducted, and the protective effects of the 2 kinds of protective stickers on facial injury/discomfort were compared.Results A total of 78 medical members finished the questionnaires (62 cases with Haishen stickers and 16 cases with 3M hydrophilic dressings). The scores of facial injury/discomfort were significantly reduced in both groups after using the protective stickers (both P < 0.05); however, there was no significant difference between the 2 groups before or after using the protective stickers (both P > 0.05). The top 4 moderate-to-severe facial injury/discomfort were fogging of protective glasses/masks (85.9%, 67/78), skin indentation (80.8%, 63/78), pain at the contact sites (74.4%, 58/78) and sultry (71.8%, 56/78), and the overall proportion of moderate-to-severe injury/discomfort was 80.8% (63/78); after using the protective stickers, the top 4 moderate-to-severe facial injury/discomfort were fogging of glasses/masks (53.8%, 42/78), sultry (41.0%, 32/78), respiratory resistance (41.0%, 32/78) and skin indentation (38.5%, 30/78), with the overall proportion of moderate to severe injury/discomfort being 43.6% (34/78); and the top 4 improvement rates of facial injury/discomfort after using protective stickers were skin erosion (76.5%), skin redness (67.3%), pain at the contact sites (63.8%), and itching at the contact site (52.9%).Conclusion These 2 kinds of protective stickers made from different materials can improve the facial injury/discomfort caused by protective appliances, which is worth popularizing.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
相关视频

分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2021-04-27
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2022-01-24
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码
重要通知
友情提醒: 近日发现论文正式见刊或网络首发后,有人冒充我刊编辑部名义给作者发邮件,要求添加微信,此系诈骗行为!可致电编辑部核实:021-81870792。
            《海军军医大学学报》编辑部
关闭