重症肌无力合并胸腺瘤的血清学诊断:蛋白印迹法与酶联免疫法的比较
DOI:
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:


Comparison of Western blotting and ELISA in sera diagnosis of myastheni a gravis with thymoma
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的:探讨Wasternblot法对重症肌无力合并胸腺瘤(MGT)患者的血清学诊断价值。方法:分别用蛋白印迹法和酶联免疫法检测33例重症肌无力患者(有瘤16例,无瘤17例)、正常人10例、其他疾病对照18例血清中的人骨骼肌柠檬酸提取物抗体(CAE-Ab)。结果:CAE抗原中3.4万,5.0万,6.0万组分与MGT患者血清结合显色率分别为93.7%(15/16例),75.0%(12/16例),75.0%(12/16例),而其他组无1例结合显色。蛋白印迹法、酶联免疫法对MGT患者检出阳性率分别为16/16,12/16,假阳性率分别为0/17,1/17。结论:蛋白印迹法检测血清中CAE-Ab比酶联免疫法更敏感,特异性高。但蛋白印迹法比酶联免疫法操作复杂,费用较高。

    Abstract:

    Objective: To improve positive rate of thymoma diagnosis. Methods: Antibodies to CAE (citric acid extract of human skeletal muscle ) were evaluated by Western blotting and ELISA respectively in sera of myastheni a gr avis patients (16 cases with and 17 cases without thymoma),normal adults(10 case s) and other disease patients (18 cases). Results: The rates of CA E-Abs to 3.4×104, 5.0×104, 6.0×104 ingredients of CAE-antigen in MGT patients were 93.7%(15/16),75.0%(12/16), 75.0%(12/16) r espect ively. None of other groups was binding to each of these 3 ingredients. The posi tive rates of MGT patients were 16/16,12/16 respectively. The false positive rat e s were 0/17,1/17 respectively. Conclusion: Western blotting assay was more sensitive and specific than ELISA in evaluating CAE-Abs.But the operation of Western blotting assay is more complicated and expensive than ELISA.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
相关视频

分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期:
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码
重要通知
友情提醒: 近日发现论文正式见刊或网络首发后,有人冒充我刊编辑部名义给作者发邮件,要求添加微信,此系诈骗行为!可致电编辑部核实:021-81870792。
            《海军军医大学学报》编辑部
关闭