Multi-detector CT features of benign and malignant pulmonary focal ground-glass opacity nodules: a binary logistic regression analysis
CSTR:
Author:
Affiliation:

Clc Number:

Fund Project:

Supported by Youth Fund of National Natural Science Foundation of China(81000602),Natural Science Foundation of Shanghai(10ZR1438900),Major Subject of Shanghai “Mountain Climbing Plan”(06DZ19503),and Talent Development Fund of Shanghai(026).

  • Article
  • |
  • Figures
  • |
  • Metrics
  • |
  • Reference
  • |
  • Related
  • |
  • Cited by
  • |
  • Materials
  • |
  • Comments
    Abstract:

    Objective To evaluate the different multi-detector computed tomography features of benign and malignant pulmonary focal ground-glass opacity (fGGO) nodules. Methods The demographic data(sex and age), nodule location, size, and multi-detector CT (MDCT) features (shape, margin, interface, internal characteristics, and adjacent structures) of 82 fGGO patients were retrospectively analyzed. Differences between benign and malignant fGGO were analyzed by using chi-square test, Fisher exact test, and Mann-Whitney U test. Binary logistic regression analysis was also performed to draw a regression equation. Results The 82 fGGO patients included 61 with malignant and 21 with benign nodules. No statistical differences were found between benign and malignant fGGO nodules in terms of demographic data, nodule location, or nodule size. Binary logistic regression analysis showed that lobulation, interface, and pleural indentation were the important features of malignant nodules, with the corresponding odds ratio (OR) being 8.122, 3.139, and 9.076, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the obtained equation were 93.4%, 66.7%, and 86.6%, respectively. Conclusion An fGGO nodule with lobulation, well-defined but coarse interface, and pleural indentation in its MDCT image, is more likely to be malignant.

    Reference
    Related
    Cited by
Related Videos

Share
Article Metrics
  • Abstract:
  • PDF:
  • HTML:
  • Cited by:
History
  • Received:May 12,2010
  • Revised:September 17,2010
  • Adopted:September 19,2010
  • Online: October 18,2010
  • Published:
Article QR Code