Carotid endarterectomy in the real world: controversies and thinkings
CSTR:
Author:
Affiliation:

Second Military Medical University,,

Clc Number:

Fund Project:

Supported by Distinguished Professor (Oriental Scholars) Tracking Plan Funds of Shanghai Higher Education (GZ2016008), Shanghai Leading Talent Fund (035), National Natural Science Foundation of China (81570440), and 2016 Supporting Project of Medical Guidance (Chinese and Western Medicine) of Shanghai Science and Technology Commission (16411966500).

  • Article
  • |
  • Figures
  • |
  • Metrics
  • |
  • Reference
  • |
  • Related
  • |
  • Cited by
  • |
  • Materials
  • |
  • Comments
    Abstract:

    As the "gold standard" treatment for carotid artery stenosis to prevent ischemic stroke, carotid endarterectomy (CEA) has been widely accepted in the western countries; but was developing rapidly only within the past years in China. We noticed that many surgeons in China can master the surgical skills, but there is still much room for improvement in their concept understanding, surgical procedure selections, technical concepts, complication management and other aspects. Many surgeons are still puzzled by the following questions during their clinical practices, such as "Is it the plaque or intima that should be resected in CEA?" "How to resect?" "How to select the resecting site?" "To what extent should it be resected?", and "Whether to perform additional vascular cutting and anastomotic plasty?". Hereby, we summarize the above four controversies of CEA in the real world, including concept doubt, surgical tangle, conceptual differences and technical confusion. We also put forward our thinkings on the issues and shared the latest developments in this field.

    Reference
    Related
    Cited by
Related Videos

Share
Article Metrics
  • Abstract:
  • PDF:
  • HTML:
  • Cited by:
History
  • Received:October 14,2016
  • Revised:October 17,2016
  • Adopted:January 19,2017
  • Online: January 19,2017
  • Published:
Article QR Code