抗血小板药物对心血管疾病高风险老年慢性肾脏病患者全因死亡和心血管疾病死亡的影响
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

海南省卫生健康科技创新联合项目(WSJK2025MS140).


Effects of antiplatelet agents on all-cause mortality and cardiovascular mortality in elderly chronic kidney disease patients with high risk of cardiovascular disease
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

Supported by Joint Program on Health Science & Technology Innovation of Hainan Province (WSJK2025MS140).

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的 评估抗血小板治疗在降低心血管疾病(CVD)高风险老年慢性肾脏病(CKD)患者全因死亡和CVD死亡方面的益处。方法 基于美国国家健康与营养调查(NHANES)数据库1999-2018年的数据,对CVD高风险老年CKD参与者进行分析。结果 共5 316例CVD高风险老年CKD患者纳入分析。其中抗血小板治疗组557例,非抗血小板治疗组4 759例。与非抗血小板治疗组相比,抗血小板治疗组的全因死亡和CVD死亡风险没有明显增加(校正HR=1.13,95%CI 0.97~1.30;校正HR=1.24,95%CI 0.99~1.55)。在无CVD老年CKD患者中(一级预防),与非抗血小板治疗组相比,抗血小板治疗组的全因死亡和CVD死亡风险没有明显增加(校正HR=1.04,95%CI 0.79~1.37;校正HR=1.13,95%CI 0.71~1.78)。在有CVD老年CKD患者中(二级预防),与非抗血小板治疗组相比,抗血小板治疗组的全因死亡和CVD死亡风险没有明显增加(校正HR=1.15,95%CI 0.96~1.36;校正HR=1.23,95%CI 0.96~1.58)。按估算肾小球滤过率[<45、45~<60、≥60 mL/(min·1.73 m2)]或尿蛋白肌酐比值(<30、30~<300、≥300 mg/g)分层时,抗血小板治疗组与非抗血小板治疗组的全因死亡风险和CVD死亡风险差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。结论 抗血小板药物与CVD高风险老年CKD患者全因死亡风险和CVD死亡风险降低无相关性,并且在一级和/或二级预防、不同水平估算肾小球滤过率和不同水平尿蛋白肌酐比值的患者中结果类似。

    Abstract:

    Objective To evaluate the benefits of antiplatelet therapy in reducing all-cause mortality and cardiovascular disease (CVD) mortality in elderly chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients with high CVD risk. Methods Based on the data of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) database from 1999 to 2018, the elderly CKD participants with high risk of CVD were analyzed. Results A total of 5 316 elderly CKD patients with high risk of CVD were included. Among them, 557 cases used antiplatelet agents and 4 759 did not use antiplatelet drugs. Compared with the non-antiplatelet therapy group, the risk of all-cause mortality in the antiplatelet therapy group was not significantly increased (adjusted hazard ratio [HR]=1.13, 95% confidence interval [95%CI] 0.97-1.30; adjusted HR=1.24, 95%CI 0.99-1.55). In elderly CKD patients without CVD (primary prevention), compared with the non-antiplatelet therapy group, the risks of all-cause mortality and CVD mortality in the antiplatelet therapy group were not significantly increased (adjusted HR=1.04, 95%CI 0.79-1.37; adjusted HR=1.13, 95%CI 0.71-1.78). In elderly CKD patients with CVD (secondary prevention), the risks of all-cause mortality and CVD mortality in the antiplatelet therapy group were not significantly higher than those in the non-antiplatelet therapy group (adjusted HR=1.15, 95%CI 0.96-1.36; adjusted HR=1.23, 95%CI 0.96-1.58). When stratified by estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) (<45, 45-<60, ≥60 mL/[min·1.73 m2] or urinary albumin creatinine ratio (<30, 30-<300, ≥300 mg/g), there were no significant differences in all-cause mortality risk or CVD mortality risk between the 2 group (both P>0.05). Conclusion Antiplatelet agents are not associated with the reduction in all-cause mortality or CVD mortality in elder CKD population with high CVD risk, and the results are consistent across primary and/or secondary prevention, different eGFR and proteinuria categories.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
相关视频

分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2024-11-29
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2025-09-22
  • 出版日期: 2025-09-20
文章二维码
重要通知
友情提醒: 近日发现论文正式见刊或网络首发后,有人冒充我刊编辑部名义给作者发邮件,要求添加微信,此系诈骗行为!可致电编辑部核实:021-81870792。
            《海军军医大学学报》编辑部
关闭