机器人辅助腹腔镜全子宫切除术后患者恢复及健康相关生活质量分析
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

上海申康医院发展中心市级医院诊疗技术推广及优化管理项目(SHDC12024121).


Postoperative recovery and health-related quality of life in patients undergoing robot-assisted laparoscopic total hysterectomy
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

Supported by Municipal Hospital Diagnosis and Treatment Technology Promotion and Optimization Management Project of Shanghai Hospital Development Center (SHDC12024121).

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的 评估接受机器人辅助腹腔镜、传统腹腔镜或开腹全子宫切除术患者术后恢复情况及健康相关生活质量。方法 选取2022年5月至2024年5月在海军军医大学第二附属医院妇产科接受全子宫切除术的152例患者,根据手术方式将患者分为机器人辅助腹腔镜手术组(机器人手术组,44例)、传统腹腔镜手术组(腹腔镜手术组,62例)和开腹手术组(46例)。收集患者的一般资料、围手术期资料和出院后1个月内不适症状等,以及出院后1个月复诊时采用36条目简明健康调查表(SF-36)评估的健康相关生活质量。结果 3组患者年龄、BMI、受教育程度、是否有工作、诊断良恶性等方面差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。在术后住院时间、首次下床活动时间、首次进食时间、24 h内疼痛水平等方面,机器人手术组均优于腹腔镜手术组和开腹手术组(均P<0.01),出院后1个月内泌尿系统不适和消化系统不适发生率低于腹腔镜手术组和开腹手术组、下腹部疼痛发生率低于开腹手术组(均P<0.01)。机器人手术组患者出院后1个月SF-36各维度得分均高于腹腔镜手术组和开腹手术组(均P<0.01)。结论 与接受传统腹腔镜或开腹全子宫切除术的患者相比,接受机器人辅助腹腔镜全子宫切除术的患者术后恢复更快、健康相关生活质量更高。

    Abstract:

    Objective To evaluate postoperative recovery and health-related quality of life in patients undergoing robotic, laparoscopic, or open total hysterectomy. Methods A total of 152 patients who underwent total hysterectomy at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology of The Second Affiliated Hospital of Naval Medical University from May 2022 to May 2024 were enrolled and assigned to robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery group (robotic surgery group, 44 cases), traditional laparoscopic surgery group (laparoscopic surgery group, 62 cases), or open surgery group (46 cases) based on the surgical approach. General information, perioperative indexes, and discomfort symptoms 1 month after discharge were collected. Health-related quality of life was evaluated using 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36) at 1-month postoperative follow-up. Results There were no significant differences in age, body mass index, education level, work status, or diagnosis of benign or malignant diseases (all P>0.05). The postoperative hospital stay, time of first ambulation, time of first oral intake, and 24-h pain score in the robotic surgery group were significantly lower than those in the laparoscopic and open surgery groups (all P<0.01). The incidence of urinary system and digestive system discomfort within 1 month after discharge was significantly lower in the robotic surgery group than in the laparoscopic and open surgery groups, and the incidence of lower abdominal pain was significantly lower in the robotic surgery group than in the open surgery group (all P<0.01). The scores of SF-36 in each dimension were significantly higher in the robotic surgery group than those in the laparoscopic and open surgery groups 1 month after discharge (all P<0.01). Conclusion Compared with those undergoing traditional laparoscopic or open total hysterectomy, patients who underwent robot-assisted laparoscopic total hysterectomy demonstrate faster postoperative recovery and better health-related quality of life.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
相关视频

分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2025-08-20
  • 最后修改日期:2025-10-14
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2025-11-25
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码
重要通知
友情提醒: 近日发现论文正式见刊或网络首发后,有人冒充我刊编辑部名义给作者发邮件,要求添加微信,此系诈骗行为!可致电编辑部核实:021-81870792。
            《海军军医大学学报》编辑部
关闭