常规超声联合剪切波弹性成像对比人工智能鉴别乳腺结节良恶性的应用价值
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:


Application value of conventional ultrasound combined with shear wave elastography versus artificial intelligence in differentiating benign and malignant breast nodules
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的 探讨常规超声、剪切波弹性成像(SWE)与人工智能(AI)在乳腺结节良恶性鉴别中的价值,并比较其诊断效能。方法 回顾性纳入2023年6-12月于我院就诊的306例乳腺结节患者(共306个病灶),所有患者均为女性,年龄范围28~86岁,平均年龄(54±14)岁。患者均依次接受常规超声、SWE检查及超声AI辅助诊断。记录每个结节的常规超声特征、最大弹性值(Emax),以病理结果为金标准,采用二元logistic回归方法构建诊断模型。绘制各诊断方法的ROC曲线,比较其AUC以评估诊断性能差异。结果 在SWE中,Emax鉴别良恶性结节的AUC为0.71,最佳截断值为53.08 kPa。常规超声、超声AI辅助诊断系统、常规超声联合SWE(Emax)的AUC分别为0.79、0.82、0.81,超声AI辅助诊断系统的AUC高于SWE(Emax)(P<0.05),与常规超声联合SWE(Emax)模型相当(P=0.67)。结论 超声AI辅助诊断系统在乳腺结节良恶性鉴别中表现出较高的准确性,其诊断效能与常规超声联合SWE(Emax)模型相当,显示出良好的智能诊断应用前景。

    Abstract:

    Objective To explore the diagnostic value of conventional ultrasound, shear wave elastography (SWE), and artificial intelligence (AI) for differentiating benign and malignant breast nodules and to compare their diagnostic performance. Methods A total of 306 patients with breast nodules (comprising 306 lesions) treated at our hospital from Jun. to Dec. 2023 were retrospectively enrolled. All were females, aged 28-86 years, with a mean age of (54±14) years. All patients underwent conventional ultrasound, SWE, and AI-assisted ultrasound diagnosis. The conventional ultrasound features and maximum elasticity value (Emax) were recorded for each nodule. With pathological results as the gold standard, binary logistic regression was performed to construct diagnostic models. Receiver operating characteristic curves were plotted for each diagnostic method, and the area under curve (AUC) values were compared to evaluate differences in diagnostic performance. Results For SWE, the AUC of Emax for differentiating benign and malignant nodules was 0.71, with an optimal cut-off value of 53.08 kPa. The AUC values for the conventional ultrasound, the AI-assisted ultrasound diagnostic system, and the combination of conventional ultrasound and SWE (Emax) were 0.79, 0.82, and 0.81, respectively. The AUC of the AI-assisted ultrasound diagnostic system was higher than that of the SWE (Emax) alone (P<0.05), and was comparable to that of the combined model of conventional ultrasound and SWE (Emax). Conclusion The AI-assisted ultrasound diagnostic system enables automated assessment of benign and malignant nodules and demonstrates high diagnostic accuracy in differentiating breast nodules. Its diagnostic performance is comparable to that of a combined model of conventional ultrasound and SWE (Emax), indicating promising prospects for intelligent diagnostic applications.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
相关视频

分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2025-09-04
  • 最后修改日期:2025-11-11
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2026-01-23
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码
重要通知
友情提醒: 近日发现论文正式见刊或网络首发后,有人冒充我刊编辑部名义给作者发邮件,要求添加微信,此系诈骗行为!可致电编辑部核实:021-81870792。
            《海军军医大学学报》编辑部
关闭