复合炎症指标在预测视网膜静脉阻塞中的价值分析
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:


Value analysis of composite inflammation indicators in predicting retinal vein occlusion
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的 探讨复合炎症指标在视网膜静脉阻塞(RVO)中的预测效果,以筛选出适用于RVO预测的炎症指标。方法 对2020年1月至2025年3月在我院首次确诊的105例RVO患者(RVO组)及同期年龄、性别匹配的105例非RVO患者(非RVO组)的临床资料进行回顾性分析。通过单因素分析及多因素logistic回归分析方法探究白细胞计数、血小板计数、血红蛋白、血细胞比容、血小板分布宽度、单核细胞计数、淋巴细胞计数、中性粒细胞计数、血小板与淋巴细胞比值、单核细胞与淋巴细胞比值、中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(NLR)、系统性免疫炎症指数(SII)、系统性炎症反应指数(SIRI)等炎症指标在RVO预测中的作用,并通过ROC曲线分析SII和SIRI对RVO的预测效能。结果 单因素分析显示,RVO组和非RVO组的中性粒细胞计数、NLR、SII和SIRI差异有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。多因素logistic回归分析显示,SII和SIRI是RVO发生的独立危险因素(OR=1.003,95%CI 1.000~1.006;OR=3.986,95%CI 1.236~12.848)。ROC曲线分析显示,SII预测RVO的AUC值为0.644(95%CI 0.570~0.718),灵敏度为81.0%,特异度为42.9%;SIRI预测RVO的AUC值为0.608(95%CI 0.533~0.648),灵敏度为48.6%,特异度为70.5%。结论 SII和SIRI不能作为识别RVO风险的决定性指标,但因为SII和SIRI检测方便且成本低,可作为RVO筛查的辅助手段。

    Abstract:

    Objective To explore the predictive efficacy of composite inflammatory indicators for retinal vein occlusion (RVO), so as to identify inflammatory indicators suitable for RVO prediction. Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data of 105 patients with newly diagnosed RVO (RVO group) in our hospital from Jan. 2020 to Mar. 2025, together with 105 age- and gender-matched non-RVO patients (non-RVO group) during the same period. Univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression analysis were used to evaluate the predictive value of inflammatory indicators for RVO, including white blood cell count, platelet count, hemoglobin, hematocrit, platelet distribution width, monocyte count, lymphocyte count, neutrophil count, platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio, monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), systemic immune-inflammation index (SII), and systemic inflammatory response index (SIRI). The predictive performance of SII and SIRI for RVO was further evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. Results Univariate analysis showed that neutrophil count, NLR, SII, and SIRI were significantly different between 2 groups (all P<0.05). Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified SII and SIR as independent risk factors for RVO (odds ratio [OR] =1.003, 95% confidence interval [95%CI] 1.000-1.006; OR=3.986, 95%CI 1.236-12.848). ROC curve analysis demonstrated that SII had an area under curve (AUC) of 0.644 (95%CI 0.570-0.718) for predicting RVO, with a sensitivity of 81.0% and a specificity of 42.9%; SIRI had an AUC of 0.608 (95%CI 0.533-0.648), with a sensitivity of 48.6% and a specificity of 70.5%. Conclusion SII and SIRI cannot be used as definitive indicators for identifying RVO risk, but due to their easy detection and low cost, they can serve as auxiliary tools for RVO screening.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
相关视频

分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2025-06-14
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2026-04-18
  • 出版日期: 2026-04-20
文章二维码
重要通知
友情提醒: 近日发现论文正式见刊或网络首发后,有人冒充我刊编辑部名义给作者发邮件,要求添加微信,此系诈骗行为!可致电编辑部核实:021-81870792。
            《海军军医大学学报》编辑部
关闭