【打印本页】 【下载PDF全文】 【HTML】 查看/发表评论下载PDF阅读器关闭

←前一篇|后一篇→

过刊浏览    高级检索

本文已被:浏览 1693次   下载 1965 本文二维码信息
码上扫一扫!
乳腺癌保乳手术切缘宽度为2 cm与3 cm的疗效比较
于跃,施俊义*,盛湲,李莉,胡薇
0
(第二军医大学长海医院普通外科,上海 200433)
摘要:
目的:研究乳腺癌患者局部扩大切除术中切缘宽度与生存率、局部复发率和术后乳房美容效果之间的关系。方法:回顾了我院42例行切缘宽度为2 cm的局部扩大切除术的病例和37例行切缘宽度为3 cm的局部扩大切除术的病例,计算并比较两组病例治疗后5年生存率、10年生存率、5年复发率、10年复发率和术后乳房的美容效果。结果:两组病例在5年生存率、10年生存率、5年局部复发率及10年局部复发率均无统计学差异。在美容效果上,评分优良率2 cm组(90.5%)要优于3 cm组(73.0%),两者存在统计学差异(P<0.05)。结论:行局部扩大切除术时,切缘宽度2 cm已基本足够,无需进一步扩大切缘宽度,否则可能会降低术后乳房美容效果。
关键词:  乳腺肿瘤  保留乳房手术  切缘宽度  对比研究
DOI:10.3724/SP.J.1008.2007.01229
投稿时间:2007-04-16
基金项目:
Breast conserving operation for breast cancer with 2 cm and 3 cm incision margins: a comparison of outcomes
YU Yue,SHI Jun-yi*,SHENG Yuan,LI Li,HU Wei
(Department of General Surgery,Changhai Hospital,Second Military Medical University,Shanghai 200433,China)
Abstract:
Objective:To explore the relationship between margin width in extended lumpectomy for breast cancer with survival rate, local recurrence rate,and cosmetic result.Methods: The clinical data of 42 breast cancer patients who had a 2 cm incision margin width (group A) and 37 who had a 3cm incision margin width (group B) were retrospectively analyzed. The 5year, 10year survival rates, recurrence rates, and the cosmetic results were compared between the 2 groups. Results: The 5year and 10year survival rates in patients of group A were 90.1% and 85.3%, respectively; in patients of group B were 92.3% and 83.6%, respectively(P>0.05). The 5year and 10year local recurrence rates in patients of group A were 5.9% and 11.6%, respectively; in patients of group B were 3.4% and 12.9%, respectively(P>0.05).The cosmetic result was significantly better in group A than that in group B(P<0.05).Conclusion: An incision margin width of 2 cm is enough for extended lumpectomy. It is not necessary to further expand the margin width; otherwise, it may influence the cosmetic results after operation.
Key words:  breast neoplasms  breast conserving operation  incision margin  comparative study