【打印本页】 【下载PDF全文】 【HTML】 查看/发表评论下载PDF阅读器关闭

←前一篇|后一篇→

过刊浏览    高级检索

本文已被:浏览 2592次   下载 2741 本文二维码信息
码上扫一扫!
肾移植术后环孢素A诱导牙龈增生的临床因素及血清亲环素浓度分析
姜蕾1△,高明津1△,赵婧1,赵舒薇2*,赵云富1*
0
(1.第二军医大学长征医院口腔科,上海 200003
2.第二军医大学长征医院耳鼻咽喉科,上海 200003
共同第一作者
*通信作者)
摘要:
目的 分析服用环孢素A(CsA)的肾移植患者相关临床因素与牙龈增生(GO)程度的关系,初步探讨血清亲环素(CyPA)浓度与CsA诱导的牙龈增生(CIGO)的关系。方法 本研究以65例用CsA为主要免疫抑制剂抗排斥患者为研究对象,经牙龈增生指数(GOI)评价后将患者分为牙龈增生组(GO+)和牙龈无增生组(GO-)。比较两组患者年龄、性别、服药时间、服药剂量、血清CsA和CyPA服药浓度、尿素、肌酐、牙龈评价之间的差异,观察血清CyPA浓度与CIGO发生及严重程度的关系。结果 GO(GOI≥30)发生率为21.54%(14/65)。GO+组和GO-组间年龄、性别、服药时间、尿素、肌酐、服药剂量和血清CsA浓度差异均无统计学意义。GO+组血清CyPA浓度低于GO-组\[0.23(0.16~0.30) ng/mL vs 0.34(0.22~0.54) ng/mL, P=0.04)\];血清CyPA浓度与GO严重程度呈负相关(r=-0.264, P=0.03),但与CsA服药剂量和其血清浓度无关(r=-0.014, P=0.91; r=0.012, P=0.93);牙龈评价结果:GO+组的菌斑指数和龈乳头出血指数均高于GO-组(1.41±0.27 vs 1.15±0.34, P=0.01; 0.49±0.30 vs 0.25±0.11, P=0.01)。结论 CIGO的发生可能是局部因素与系统因素共同作用的结果;血清CyPA浓度可能是独立于CsA服药剂量和血药浓度之外的CIGO风险因素,对其进行检测有助于临床医师预判GO的发生。
关键词:  牙龈增生  环孢素  亲环素A  肾移植
DOI:10.3724/SP.J.1008.2013.00515
投稿时间:2012-12-31修订日期:2013-04-02
基金项目:国家自然科学基金(81170966).
Clinical factors of cyclosporine A-induced gingival overgrowth and serum cyclophilin A in renal transplant recipients
JIANG Lei1△,GAO Ming-jin1△,ZHAO Jing1,ZHAO Shu-wei2*,ZHAO Yun-fu1*
(1. Department of Stomatology, Changzheng Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai 200003, China
2. Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Changzheng Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai 200003, China
Co-first authors.
*Corresponding authors.)
Abstract:
Objective To investigate the relationship between the clinical factors of renal transplant recipients medicated with cyclosporine A (CsA) and gingival overgrowth (GO), so as to evaluate the association of serum cyclophilin A (CyPA) with CsA-induced GO. Methods Totally 65 renal transplant recipients were enrolled in this study. The degrees of GO were evaluated using gingival overgrowth index (GOI) and the patients were subsequently grouped into overgrowth (GO+) and non-overgrowth (GO-). The age, gender, medication duration, dosage of immunosuppressive agents, serum concentrations of CsA and CyPA, creatinine, ureal and gingival assessments were compared between the two groups. The possible correlation between CyPA level and the development and severity of CsA-induced GO was also identified. Results The number of GO+ subjects (GOI≥30) was 14 (21.54%) in the present patients. There were no significant differences in age, gender and medication duration, dosage of immunosuppressive agents, serum concentration of CsA, serum creatinine or ureal level between the two groups. Serum CyPA level in GO+ group was significantly lower than that in GO- group (0.23 \[0.16-0.30\] ng/mL vs 0.34\[0.22-0.54\] ng/mL, P=0.04). Serum CyPA concentration was negatively correlated with GO degree (r=-0.264, P=0.03), and was not correlated with dosage or concentration of CsA (r=-0.014, P=0.91; r=0.012, P=0.93). In addition, the patients with GO presented a significantly high plaque index and papilla bleeding index than those without GO (1.41±0.27 vs 1.15±0.34, P=0.01; 0.49±0.30 vs 0.25±0.11, P=0.01). Conclusion Development of CsA-induced GO may be due to a co-work of both local and system factors; serum CyPA level might be an risk factor for CsA-induced GO independent to dosage and serum level of CsA, which may help to detect GO in clinic.
Key words:  gingival hyperplasia  cyclosporine  cyclophilin A  kidney transplantation