【打印本页】 【下载PDF全文】 【HTML】 查看/发表评论下载PDF阅读器关闭

←前一篇|后一篇→

过刊浏览    高级检索

本文已被:浏览 2211次   下载 2360 本文二维码信息
码上扫一扫!
主动脉瓣机械瓣置换术后人工瓣膜不匹配对手术死亡率的影响
王律1,2△,李鑫1△,乔帆1,徐志云1*
0
(1.第二军医大学长海医院心胸外科,上海200433
2.解放军252医院心胸外科,保定 071000
共同第一作者
*通信作者)
摘要:
目的 通过风险调整死亡率的比较,明确主动脉瓣置换术后人工瓣膜-患者不匹配(PPM)程度对患者手术死亡率的影响。方法 回顾性分析第二军医大学长海医院2007年1月1日至2011年12月31日共1 247例主动脉瓣置换术后患者的病例资料,计算患者EuroSCOREⅡ预期死亡率,以患者瓣膜有效开口面积指数将患者分为无或轻度PPM、中度PPM、重度PPM 3组,分别计算各组风险调整死亡率及其95%可信区间。结果 3组患者实际死亡率分别为:无或轻度PPM组2.79%(29/1 040),中度PPM组5.00%(8/160),重度PPM组8.51%(4/47),组间差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);EuroSCORE Ⅱ预期死亡率分别为:无或轻度PPM组2.82%,中度PPM组2.69%,重度PPM组2.72%,组间差异无统计学意义;风险调整死亡率分别为:无或轻度PPM组0.99(95%可信区间0.93~1.05),中度PPM组1.86(95%可信区间1.68~2.08),重度PPM组3.13(95%可信区间2.56~4.00),组间差异有统计学意义。结论 主动脉瓣机械瓣置换术后PPM程度的升高可导致死亡风险的增加。
关键词:  主动脉瓣;人工心脏瓣膜  狭窄  医院死亡率  风险调整
DOI:10.3724/SP.J.1008.2013.00403
投稿时间:2012-12-25修订日期:2013-01-30
基金项目:卫生部专项基金(20082096).
Effect of prosthesis-patient mismatch after aortic valve replacement with mechanical valve on operative mortality
WANG Lü1,2△,LI Xin1△,QIAO Fan1,XU Zhi-yun1*
(1. Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai 200433, China
2. Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, No.252 Hospital of PLA, Baoding 071000, Hebei, China
Co-first authors.
*Corresponding author.)
Abstract:
Objective To assess the relationship between early mortality and degree of prosthesis-patient mismatch(PPM) after aortic valve replacement surgery using risk-adjusted mortality of EuroSCORE Ⅱ . Methods The clinical data of 1 247 consecutive patients who underwent aortic valve replacement from Jan. 1, 2007 to Dec. 31, 2011 in our hospital were retrospectively analyzed. The EuroSCORE Ⅱ-predicted mortality and the effective orifice area index (EOAi) of artificial aortic valve were calculated for each patient. The patients were divided into three groups according to aortic EOAi: non-to-mild PPM, moderate PPM, and severe PPM. Risk-adjusted mortality and 95% confidence interval were calculated for each group. The EuroSCORE Ⅱ-predicted mortality and risk-adjusted mortality were compared among three groups. Results The observed mortality was 2.79% (29/1 040) for patients with non-to-mild PPM, 5.00% (8/160) for patients with moderate PPM, and 8.51% (4/47) for patients with severe PPM, with significant differences found between groups (P<0.05) . There were no significant differences in EuroSCORE Ⅱ-predicted mortalities among the three groups (2.82% for the non-to-mild PPM group, 2.69% for the moderate PPM group, and 2.72% for the severe PPM group). And the risk-adjusted mortality of non-to-mild PPM group (0.99, 95%CI: 0.93-1.05) was significantly lower than those of moderate PPM group (1.86, 95%CI: 1.68-2.08) and severe PPM group (3.13, 95%CI: 2.56-4.00). Conclusion High degree of aortic PPM after aortic valve replacement is associated with increased operative mortality.
Key words:  aortic valve  heart valve prosthesis  stenosis  hospital mortality  risk adjustment