| 摘要: |
| 目的 验证中国军人职业倦怠量表的信度和效度。方法 采用随机整群抽样法抽取1 292名军人,以中国军人职业倦怠量表进行测评,并对其中130名官兵施测中国军人职业压力量表。利用SPSS17.0、Amos7.0对中国军人职业倦怠量表进行信、效度检验。结果 中国军人职业倦怠总量表Cronbach's α系数为0.844,各分量表Cronbach's α系数为0.683~0.800(P<0.01)；总量表的分半信度是0.834,各因子的分半信度为0.575~0.758(P<0.01)；量表各因子与总分之间相关系数为0.655~0.809(P<0.01)。中国军人职业倦怠量表总分与中国军人职业压力量表总分相关系数为0.538(P<0.01)。探索性因素分析结果显示,此研究结果与原量表各条目的因子归类一致；经验证性因素分析发现,数据与模型拟合程度较高,拟合指标的χ2值为1 465.447,近似均方根误差(RMSEA)为0.060,塔克-刘易斯指数、比较拟合指数、增值拟合指数、拟合优度指数分别为0.949、0.895、0.915、0.893。结论 中国军人职业倦怠量表信度和效度都较好,达到了心理测量学标准,能够作为测量军人职业倦怠的有效工具。 |
| 关键词: 中国军人 职业倦怠 信度 效度 |
| DOI：10.3724/SP.J.1008.2014.01163 |
| 投稿时间：2014-02-25修订日期：2014-04-21 |
| 基金项目:国家科技支撑计划(2009BAI77B04)，国家高技术研究发展计划(“863”计划)(2008AA022602)，上海市教委科研创新重点项目(11ZS79)，上海市卫生和计划生育委员会青年科研项目(13QN168). |
|
| Validity and reliability test of Chinese Military Job Burnout Scale |
| DONG Wei,XIAO Jie,TUO Nan,LIU Wei-zhi,YAN Jin* |
(Department of Military Psychology, Faculty of Psychology & Mental Health, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai 200433, China
*Corresponding authors) |
| Abstract: |
| Objective To examine the reliability and validity of Chinese Military Job Burnout Scale (CMJBS). Methods A test with CMJBS was carried out on 1 292 armymen chosen by stratified cluster sampling, and 130 of them were also tested by Chinese Military Occupational Stress Scale (CMOSS). SPSS17.0 and Amos7.0 were used to examine the reliability and validity of CMJBS. Results The Cronbach's α coefficient of total scale of CMJBS was 0.844, and those of subscales of CMJBS were 0.683-0.800 (P<0.01); the split-half reliability of total scale was 0.834, and those of the subscales were 0.575-0.758 (P<0.01). The correlation coefficients between factors and total scale score were 0.655-0.809 (P<0.01); the correlation coefficients between total scale score of CMJBS and CMOSS was 0.538(P<0.01). The results of exploratory factor analysis showed that the scale of the entries in the collation and factors named were consistent. The results of confirmatory factor analysis showed a higher degree of accordance between the sample data and the hypothesized structure of factors, with the χ2 statistic being 1 465.447 and RMSEA (root mean square error of approximation) being 0.060, and with TLI (Tucker-Lewis index), CFI (comparative fit index), IFI (incremental fit index) and GFI (goodness of fit index) being 0.949, 0.895, 0.915, and 0.893, respectively. Conclusion The reliability and validity of CMJBS meet standards for scale designing and can serve as a tool for measuring the job burnout of Chinese armymen. |
| Key words: Chinese armyman job burnout reliability validity |
