【打印本页】 【下载PDF全文】 【HTML】 查看/发表评论下载PDF阅读器关闭

←前一篇|后一篇→

过刊浏览    高级检索

本文已被:浏览 437次   下载 392 本文二维码信息
码上扫一扫!
股骨颈动力交叉钉系统治疗中青年Pauwels Ⅱ~Ⅲ型股骨颈骨折的疗效
范忠诚,万大地,涂源源,汪群力*
0
(上海市第六人民医院海口骨科与糖尿病医院骨科, 海口 570300
*通信作者)
摘要:
目的 探讨股骨颈动力交叉钉系统治疗中青年PauwelsⅡ~Ⅲ型股骨颈骨折的疗效。方法 回顾性分析13例接受股骨颈动力交叉钉系统治疗的中青年PauwelsⅡ~Ⅲ型股骨颈骨折患者的临床资料。13例患者中男8例、女5例,年龄为(50.9±14.1)岁,骨折Pauwels分型Ⅱ型4例、Ⅲ型9例。对患者术前、术后的髋关节Harris评分、Barthel指数评分、疼痛视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分进行比较。结果 13例患者的手术时间为(52.08±11.54)min,术中出血量为(68.8±20.4)mL,术中透视次数为(12.8±2.2)次,住院时间为(5.8±1.7)d。以Garden对线指数评估骨折复位质量,Ⅰ级8例、Ⅱ级5例。骨折愈合时间为(4.0±0.7)周。2例(15.4%)并发股骨颈短缩(轻度1例、中度1例),无并发下肢静脉血栓的患者。术后部分负重时间为(4.1±1.0)周,完全负重时间为(7.2±0.9)周。术后6个月髋关节Harris评分为89.46±4.35、Barthel指数评分为79.92±22.17、VAS评分为0.69±0.75,术后12个月上述指标分别为90.77±3.37、91.31±3.82、0.62±0.65,与术前(18.08±6.70、23.38±7.07、8.08±1.32)比较均明显改善(P均<0.01)。结论 股骨颈动力交叉钉系统治疗中青年PauwelsⅡ~Ⅲ型股骨颈骨折疗效良好,且有创伤小、骨折块愈合好、并发症少等优点。
关键词:  股骨颈骨折  骨折固定术  股骨颈动力交叉钉系统  治疗结果
DOI:10.16781/j.CN31-2187/R.20230338
投稿时间:2023-06-16修订日期:2023-09-06
基金项目:海南省卫生健康行业科研项目(19A200123,20A200518),海南省科技专项资助项目(ZDYF2020122).
Efficacy of femoral neck system on young and middle-aged patients with Pauwels Ⅱ-Ⅲ femoral neck fractures
FAN Zhongcheng,WAN Dadi,TU Yuanyuan,WANG Qunli*
(Department of Orthopaedics, Haikou Hospital for Orthopaedics and Diabetes, Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital, Haikou 570300, Hainan, China
*Corresponding author)
Abstract:
Objective To explore the efficacy of femoral neck system (FNS) in the treatment of Pauwels Ⅱ-Ⅲ femoral neck fractures in young and middle-aged patients. Methods The clinical data of 13 young and middle-aged patients with femoral neck fractures undergoing FNS treatment were retrospectively analyzed. There were 8 males and 5 females, with an age of (50.9±14.1) years. The Pauwels of fractures were type Ⅱ in 4 cases and type Ⅲ in 9 cases. Preoperative and postoperative Harris hip score, Barthel index score and visual analogue scale (VAS) score were compared. Results The operative time of the 13 patients was (52.08±11.54) min, intraoperative blood loss was (68.8±20.4) mL, intraoperative fluoroscopy was (12.8±2.2) times, and hospital stay was (5.8±1.7) d. The Garden alignment index was used to evaluate the quality of fracture reduction. There were 8 cases of grade Ⅰ and 5 cases of grade Ⅱ. The fracture healing time was (4.0±0.7) weeks. Two cases (15.4%) were complicated with femoral neck shortening (1 mild, 1 moderate), and no concurrent lower limb venous thrombosis was found. The postoperative partial weight-bearing time was (4.1±1.0) weeks, and complete weight-bearing time was (7.2±0.9) weeks. The Harris hip score was 89.46±4.35, Barthel index score was 79.92±22.17, and VAS score was 0.69±0.75 at 6 months after surgery; at 12 months after surgery, the above indicators were 90.77±3.37, 91.31±3.82, and 0.62±0.65, respectively, which were significantly improved compared with those before operation (18.08±6.70, 23.38±7.07, and 8.08±1.32) (all P<0.01). Conclusion FNS is effective in the treatment of young and middle-aged patients with PauwelsⅡ-Ⅲ femoral neck fractures. It has the advantages of less trauma, good healing of fracture block and fewer complications.
Key words:  femoral neck fractures  fracture fixation  femoral neck system  outcomes