| 本文已被：浏览 661次 下载 811次 |
码上扫一扫！ |
| 单次高强度间歇运动对抑郁群体大学生情绪及额叶α频段偏侧化的影响 |
| 裘莎丽1,刘伟志2,周晓静3,王相1,臧育恒1,王兴1* |
|
|
(1. 上海体育学院体育教育训练学院, 上海 200438;
2. 海军军医大学(第二军医大学)心理系基础心理学教研室, 上海 200433;
3. 上海立信会计金融学院体育与健康学院, 上海 201620
*通信作者) |
|
| 摘要: |
| 目的 通过分析正负性情绪量表（PANAS）得分和脑电额叶α频段的变化，探讨单次高强度间歇运动对抑郁群体大学生正负性情绪和额叶α频段偏侧化的影响。方法 采用抑郁自评量表（SDS）筛选处于轻度和中度抑郁情绪状态的在校大学生38名，采用掷硬币的方法随机分为高强度间歇运动组（19人）和对照组（19人）。高强度间歇运动组进行20 min的单次高强度间歇运动，对照组静坐20 min。于干预后间隔1周，再次采用SDS测试被试的抑郁评分。在干预前和干预后即刻，采用PANAS测试两组被试的情绪状态，采用脑电地形图仪采集被试静息状态下额叶α频段功率值。比较干预前后两组被试PANAS得分、SDS得分和额叶α频段总功率及偏侧化的变化。结果 与干预前相比，高强度间歇运动组被试干预后SDS得分下降，正性情绪得分增高，负性情绪得分降低（P均<0.05）；对照组干预前后上述指标差异均无统计学意义（P均>0.05）。与干预前相比，高强度间歇运动组被试干预后右额叶α频段总功率值增高（P<0.05），额叶α频段偏侧化均得到改善（P均<0.05）；与干预前相比，对照组干预后左、右额叶α频段总功率值均增高（P均<0.05），但额叶α频段偏侧化差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）。结论 单次高强度间歇运动能有效改善大学生的情绪及额叶α频段偏侧化。 |
| 关键词: 单次高强度间歇运动 抑郁 脑电图 α频段 偏侧化 |
| DOI：10.16781/j.CN31-2187/R.20210986 |
| 投稿时间：2021-09-27修订日期：2022-04-29 |
| 基金项目:上海市人类运动能力开发与保障重点实验室项目（11DZ2261100）. |
|
| Effects of single high-intensity interval exercise on emotion and lateralization of frontal lobe α frequency band in depressed college students |
| QIU Sha-li1,LIU Wei-zhi2,ZHOU Xiao-jing3,WANG Xiang1,ZANG Yu-heng1,WANG Xing1* |
(1. School of Physical Education and Training, Shanghai University of Sport, Shanghai 200438, China;
2. Department of Basic Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, Naval Medical University (Second Military Medical University), Shanghai 200433, China;
3. School of Sports and Health, Shanghai Lixin University of Accounting and Finance, Shanghai 201620, China
*Corresponding author) |
| Abstract: |
| Objective To investigate the effects of single high-intensity interval exercise on positive and negative emotions and lateralization of frontal lobe α frequency band in depressed college students by analyzing the changes of the scores of positive and negative affect schedule (PANAS) and electroencephalography (EGG) α frequency band at the frontal lobe. Methods A total of 38 college students in mild and moderate depressed mood were screened by self-rating depression scale (SDS). They were randomly divided into high-intensity interval exercise group (n=19) and control group (n=19) by coin toss. The high-intensity interval exercise group performed single high-intensity interval exercise for 20 min, while the control group sat still for 20 min. After the intervention, SDS was used again to test the depression scores of the subjects 1 week later. Before and immediately after the intervention, PANAS was used to test the emotional state of the subjects, and the power values of frontal lobe α frequency band of the subjects at rest were collected by EGG topographic map. The PANAS scores, SDS scores and the changes of total power of the frontal lobe α frequency band and lateralization of the 2 groups were compared before and after the intervention. Results The SDS scores of the subjects were decreased, the positive emotion scores were increased, and the negative emotion scores were decreased in the single high-intensity interval exercise group after intervention (all P<0.05). There were no significant differences in the above indexes in the control group before or after intervention (all P>0.05). The total power values of the right frontal lobe α frequency band of the subjects were increased in the high-intensity interval exercise group after intervention (P<0.05), and the lateralization of the frontal lobe α frequency band was improved (both P<0.05); the total power values of the left and right frontal lobe α frequency band were increased in the control group after intervention (both P<0.05), but there was no significant difference in the lateralization of the frontal lobe α frequency band (P>0.05). Conclusion Single high-intensity interval exercise can effectively improve college students' mood and lateralization of frontal lobe α frequency band. |
| Key words: single high-intensity interval exercise depression electroencephalography α frequency band lateralization |
